The above tests are performed by measuring the energy fields of the individual components of the rock. I have tried to duplicate Dr. Korotev's analysis sheets as posted on his Washington University web site. My hope is it will provide an estimate of the content close enough to determine how likely the rock is an actual meteorite. The energy field of each mineral and metal is induced into the entire rock sample so it is effectively measuring the content of the entire rock as well as the amount of the individual target material.
My first attempts to measure the actual energy field of the individual components were before I fully understood dowsing as being simply mass attraction. The rod I had been using was heavy with a fairly large energy field and was inducing its field into the sample. I was getting readings of the actual components, the energy field of the rod, of the total rock sample, and of the individual components with no real understanding of so many values.
I solved most of the original issues by making the rod much lighter in weight to eliminate unwanted reading and also less sensitive to prevent stray field readings. The values with a zero reading are too small to calculate, but overall, the actual readings seem to be in the ballpark with those from a chemical analysis.
Should a rock contain measurable amounts of iridium, diamond, iron and nickel with around 10,000 ppm of chromium, and with SiO2 around the 50% range I would send a sample for a lab analysis.
I owe a huge debt of gratitude to Dr. Randy Korotev of Washington University for his time, and for his patience in dealing with me in my journey into dowsing as a valid method for finding meteorites even though he had no idea what I was trying to do. His web pages are the most informative information source I have found.